 |
Like most kids her age, my 4-year-old niece Amelia loves
fantasy--princesses and mermaids figure prominently--and she makes up countless
stories that blend, in willy-nilly and silly ways, what she knows of the
world and what she can't yet perceive. Among the things she doesn't know
are those I can't help dreading that she will, soon enough, figure out.
Throughout human history, of course, we've told ourselves
stories to explain the unknown and unknowable. For natural disasters--earthquakes,
volcanic eruptions, epidemics--various tropes recur, especially that of
punishment visited upon us by angered gods. In her book, AIDS and Its
Metaphors, Susan Sontag wrote, "From classic fiction to the latest
journalism, the standard plague story is of inexorability, inescapability.
The unprepared are taken by surprise; those observing the recommended precautions
are struck down as well." Along with their inexorableness, she notes,
"plagues are invariably regarded as judgments on society." Sontag's
purpose was to rid AIDS of the stigmatizing metaphors--of inevitability
and of punishment for impurity--that obscure the biological disease process.
Past epochs of massive climate change are prehistoric; we
know them from evidence gathered in rocks and ice and bones. We have stories
of cataclysmic disaster, like the Biblical flood that floated Noah's ark,
but no historical experience of global climate change on the scale that
many scientists believe is coming. Psychologists have suggested that our
species has not evolved to respond to such long-term threats; we are instead
wired to react quickly to immediate danger. Uncertainty as to the exact
nature of the threat complicates our psychological responses--which run
the gamut from avoidance and angry denial to can-do optimism. I also recognize
the guilty glee I take in relating the latest scary finding. It is not easy
to avoid the allure of the abyss.
As a childhood Baptist, I heard my Sunday school teacher's reassurance that I would ascend into Heaven during the Rapture, escaping the apocalyptic inferno that would consume the unsaved. Despite undeniable satisfaction in being among the chosen, I found myself more horrified than elated, knowing friends and family members were damned. The secular version of this turn of mind casts climate change as punishment for capitalist profligacy and callousness toward the natural environment. Both tales dance with death and give cold comfort against the escalating evidence of global warming. There is my niece to think about.
John Harte, who has been studying climate change for three
decades, and is profiled in Flower Power,
told me that scare tactics have proved ineffectual in convincing people
to act on the dangers of climate change. And we don't honestly yet know,
for example, if there's a tipping point when Greenland's melting ice will
slow or stop deep ocean currents, freezing most of Europe. What is important,
Harte says, is that we act, that we do what we can to slow the process.
Although nature is likely indifferent to our need to find
meaning in global climate change, we may well require new morality tales--ones
more clear-eyed than divine punishment--to carry us forward. They have already
begun to take shape: Californians conserving our way out of the last energy
crisis. Public officials overcoming partisanship to pass more stringent
carbon controls. Economists and entrepreneurs devising less oil-dependent
policies and enterprises. Engineers creating technologies that foster conservation
or create new sources of fuel. Individuals and families challenging themselves
to use less energy. No fantasies, these are stories of people and societies
rejecting both popular cynicism and tempting apocalyptic visions to marshal
their ingenuity and their better selves to take up perhaps the greatest
challenge to face our generation, and those to come.
Kerry Tremain, Editor
Joining forces: This special issue
of California was produced collaboratively with Berkeley’s Graduate School
of Journalism. A conference organized in May by Dean Orville Schell and
the Berkeley China Initiative, The China--U.S. Climate Change Forum, provided
us with up-to-date research and expert opinion. The heart of the issue,
including our international reports on affected areas, was supplied by journalism
students participating in a class on climate change led by Sandy Tolan with
Energy and Resources Group professor John Harte. We also were grateful for
the assistance of our colleague, the accomplished editor and writer Roger
Cohn, who shepherded and shaped the school’s contributions, aided by Meghann
Farnsworth. Howard Foster and John Radke from the College of Environmental
Design provided valuable help by conceptualizing and producing innovative
maps to chart real and potential greenhouse effects. Our interns, Erik Vance
and Julie Rehmeyer, who joined us from the UC Santa Cruz science writing
program, and Amy Goldwitz, a graduate student at the journalism school,
worked especially hard to bring the science of climate change to life in
the issue. I would like to express my appreciation to all the students (who
took to the editing process like seasoned pros), to Sandy, to Roger, and
especially to Orville, who made this collaboration a successful one. For
more of what it produced, including audio-visual features, please go to
www.californiamag.org. --K.T.
|  |