Pet Therapy: Students Increasingly Bringing “Emotional Support” Animals to College

By Glen Martin

Americans have not only embraced the Shultz dictum that happiness is a warm puppy: They’re applying it to warm rabbits, kangaroo rats, pot-bellied pigs, cockatiels and ferrets. And for that matter, to decidedly tepid ball pythons, Cuban rock iguanas and Chilean rose hair tarantulas. The issue here isn’t the type of beastie; it’s that animals equate to happiness, whether you’re at home, in the workplace, or in the stressful milieu that is the modern academy. An increasing number of students believe they benefit from having pets for emotional support or comfort. And those with diagnosed mental health problems—including anxiety, panic attacks and depression—are asserting their right to keep them in university residences at campuses such as UC Berkeley.

Although counseling or psychiatric care may be necessary to address these real and growing needs, pets can be a valuable adjunct for restoring the emotional equilibrium of troubled students.  Some of the evidence for this is simply empirical: Who hasn’t felt better stroking a furry cat or feeding a carrot to an equable equine? Though still relatively scant, there is scientific evidence for the positive effects of animal propinquity. A recent article in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, for instance, concluded that “animal-assisted intervention” may prove a good complementary therapy option for trauma.

Nobody claims the dorms are evolving into petting zoos. But animals are gaining a toehold (clawhold?) in Cal residences.

Which is all well and good if you’re cool with critters in general—but what if you’re afraid of dogs, allergic to cat dander, or freaked out by snakes, even the benign non-venomous kind? Is the French lop rabbit down the hall just the camel’s nose under the tent, a harbinger that the residences will soon teem with—well, camels?

Probably not. Berkeley allow animals in the residences under guidelines established by two laws, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. But the criteria for each are fairly explicit.

“The Americans with Disabilities Act covers people with psychological disabilities, and only authorizes dogs and in some cases, miniature horses,” says Aaron Cohen, a staff psychologist for Berkeley’s residential and student service programs. “And the animals must also be trained to respond to specific patient needs. For example, they can alert patients who’ve missed their medications. Or a dog could be trained to put its head in the lap of a patient with bipolar disorder who’s on the verge of a manic episode.”

By contrast, emotional support animals, covered by the Fair Housing Act, can be any species, says Cohen.

“You’d require a diagnosis (from a qualified professional) of your condition and documentation establishing that it would be difficult for you to live in a stable and comfortable fashion in the residences without your animal,” says Cohen. “But the animal doesn’t have to be trained to perform a specific task.”

That doesn’t mean the animals are accorded carte blanche to act like utter animals, however. They are expected to conform to the same rules applied to human residents: No biting or mauling, spitting venom or defecating in hallways, let alone blasting music at 3:00 am in accompaniment to a beer pong tournament.

Adam Ratliff, Cal’s critical communications manager, emailed California that “If the animal’s and owner’s behavior becomes a nuisance or danger to other community members (e.g., noise, lack of waste pick-up etc.) then we do contact students to help mitigate the community impact.”

One freshman at Washington State University was allowed to bring a 95-pound pig into her dorm—and, because the pig refused to use the stairs and was stressed out by the freight elevator, wound up staying in the second-floor dorm room and using a litter box. “The other students thought the pig was kind of cool, “ Hannah Mitchell, the dorm’s residential director at the time, told The New York Times, “but less cool when it began to smell.”

It’s easy to poke fun at the idea of housing swine or alpacas or Komodo dragons in the dorms, but as Ratliff indicates, requests are generally for more compact pets—felines, small dogs, and perhaps rabbits, guinea pigs or white rats.

Since the beginning of this school year, he continued, the university has approved all documented requests for both service and emotional support animals: 33 so far. All are either dogs or cats, wrote Ratliff, adding, “The type of animal does not impact our process or review.”

For some students, the university can be a bleak and lonely place, and that seems especially the case for top, highly competitive institutions. According to the American College Health Association, almost a third of students found themselves so depressed at some point during 2014 that they couldn’t function. Around 15 percent of Cal students used campus counseling services last year, up from 10 percent five years ago; at UCLA, that figure has spiked to 20 percent.

Throughout the UC system, student demand for mental health services has jumped 37 percent in the last six years.

As a way to reduce overall student stress, Berkeley’s University Health Services has partnered with Tony LaRussa’s Animal Rescue Foundation (ARF) to bring pups to Sproul Plaza once a month, with bonus visits during finals. These “Pet Hugs” events are open to all passersby, and very popular. “Cal is a highly competitive campus of 37,000 students and we at UHS are always looking for ways to help students manage their stress levels,” the health services website explains. “Petting an ARF dog offers instant stress relief.”

 Cohen says he first heard of emotional support animals in 2004, “so that’s a long time to have a conversation about the subject.” And even now, he says, evaluation guidelines are not deeply detailed. “It’s easier to determine (qualifications) if you’re looking at psychological disability rather than emotional support,” he says.

So is there potential for abuse?  Can someone who is in every way well-adjusted and anxiety-free bring a kitty cat to the dorms just because he or she really, really likes cats? Of course, says Cohen.

“But there’s the potential for abuse in many areas, and I really haven’t seen much of it in our system,” he says.  “Emotional support animals are gaining acceptance. Even on the airlines, anyone can bring an emotional support animal for a fee, though I recall an incident where a guy with a huge pig was walked off a plane. It’s a balancing act. We need to maintain guidelines, but we also want to support students. Further, it’s the law. Under the Americans with Disabilities and Fair Housing Acts, service and support animals must be accommodated if there is documentation of need.”

In Berkeley’s dorms, no one seems to be getting in much of a lather about the issue. The general attitude seems to be: As long as no roommate is allergic or otherwise severely stressed by our four-footed (or six-or-eight-footed), winged, finned or scaled planetary associates, bring ‘em on. Some students told California that a good alternative might be a separate floor for animal owners, or a “pet place” where the animals could be housed and visited regularly.

“I think (students) should be able to have emotional support animals because Berkeley is a stressful place,” says Danny Chera, a freshman majoring in microbial biology. “Animals are a way of getting away from reality and kind of having something close to them. I have tons of pets at home, dogs, fish, birds. They keep me sane. I would love to have them here. I think it would help me a lot.”

Even undergrads who aren’t wildly enthusiastic about the emotional support concept generally are supportive.

“I personally would not want to have a pet,” says Hosefa Basrai, a freshman in pre-business. “Woofing would make me uncomfortable, especially at night. (But) I think if they need it, they should have them.”

As for critics who complain that comfort animals are infantilizing students? Dorm residents apparently beg to differ.

“You could be 30 years old and still want the support of animals,” says Chera, “because the bond you can share with animals you can’t really get with people. Everybody deserves whatever they need to cope.”

With additional reporting by Marica Petrey and Maris Harmon

Share this article:
Google+ Reddit


I am one of the 33 students that currently has an emotional support animal in on-campus housing, and I cannot extend my gratitude enough to those working in Housing Accommodations. I have lived with depression and anxiety all of my life, and having a support animal has helped keep me stable during my first hectic and stressful semester at Cal. Since I have a single, roommate allergies are not an issue. Most of the other residents in the hall are also enthusiastic about me having her, and she helps many of the other women in my dorm de-stress when needed.
Here at UCB Family Housing the “emotional support animal” issue is out of control. There are currently 70+ “emotional support animals” here. While there are some cases of legitimate need, the majority of these cases come from people bending the rules to bring pets into family housing. While the majority of the animals are well behaved, there are some owners who are not. These owners allow their dogs to run around off leash and do not attend to excrement left in communal courtyards where young children play. Some dogs have been aggressive and have lunged at young children. It is only a matter of time before there is an attack. Management is too afraid of legal repercussions to address the issue. Communal laundry machines are clogged with dog and cat hair and leave “sensitive” residents with allergic reactions. Perhaps the worst offence is the damage done to apartments (namely urine and feces soiled carpet) that are a great expense for the UC to maintain. The cost for this additional maintenance ends up showing up in raised rents. The pet owners are protected… what about the rest of us?
As an autistic person with a myriad of mental illnesses, I can safely say I wouldn’t be alive if not for my cat. Two years ago, I was teetering on the edge of suicide. I was alone. Then, I got Rowena. She is the best cat. She brings me back from panic attacks and gives me something to live for.
There is a young girl who comes to the park where I walk my dog. She has a bunny that is her therapy bunny. She takes it everywhere with her. I have seen how this animal brings comfort to this young lady. And I’m not sure if she could get this from anybody else. So, good luck to this program.
Hi! My name is Jilly Rolnick and I am Northwestern student writing an article about emotional support dogs on college campuses. I would love to talk to you about your experience. Let me know ASAP please. My email is Thanks, Jilly Rolnick
Very well written article.
I like would just like to say I agree to your comment and wondering what college do you go to? I am a high school student who currently got a new puppy as an emotional support dog, and I’m just doing my research towards taking my support dog to college. I would also like to hear any tips, if you have any.
I’m sorry, but whenever there’s room for abuse it somehow finds the way. The USA is going to have to make some stiff & strict rules regarding service animals. To be sure, there are legit Service Dog owners, however the percentage of people pawning off their family pet as a Service Dog is getting out of control. Just yesterday I seen to “fake” SD….who while in a Wal-Mart went over to a display of bags of sugar, and hiked it’s leg and pissed all over. I don’t know where the idea came from that Service Animal owners shouldn’t be required to acknowledge their service animal and have to show proof of a Legit Registration along with a current vaccination schedule is ridiculous. What makes you think that you shouldn’t be asked about your sevice animal? You would think you would WANT managers,etc. to know that you are bringing a well-behaved trained dog to the stores. I have come across several LEGIT service owners that their dogs aren’t licensed nor do they have the proper vaccinations that are required of a dog owner. This B.S. will continue until one of these “FAKE” service dogs attacks or bites someone in a place of business minding their OWN business only to get bit by a dog that isn’t actually a service dog to begin with. I am going to start talking to the legislators of my state to see what can be done with all of you who have FAKE service animals that are no more than the FAMILY PET. So, just keep on acting ridiculous about the fact you feel its wrong to be asked to show proof of the reason why the animal is trained for service work. The sad thing is that it’s people who are scamming others that don’t have to pay for these so-called rules that most likely will soon be put into place, and it’s absolutely WRONG that the legit Service dog owner will be hurt by the changes that the US government will most likely impose soon.