Close Mobile Menu

Class Considerations

June 12, 2013

With the Supreme Court poised to rule on a case that could end the practice of universities using race as a determining factor in admissions, pundits like New York Times editor Bill Keller wonder whether affirmative action should be based on class rather than race. In a recent editorial, Keller writes that factoring economic class into admissions “…is controversial, the execution is complicated and it doesn’t come cheap, but it promises a richer kind of variety – and it is less likely to run afoul of the Supreme Court… .”

The University of California is right in the thick of the legal brouhaha, having filed an amicus brief to the relevant case, Fisher v Texas. The brief argues, among other things, that “student body diversity cannot be fully realized at selective institutions without taking race into account in undergraduate admissions decisions.”

The numbers seem to back up that stance. Between 1995 and 2009, African Americans constituted between seven and eight percent of California’s high-school graduates. In 1995 they accounted for slightly more than seven percent of entering freshmen at Cal. That number plummeted to about three percent after the Regents voted to end race-based considerations in admissions and California voters passed Proposition 209; the 1996 law bars state institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity in areas like public education and government contracts. African American admissions to Berkeley have grown only slightly since then.

Figures for Latino students have been higher, but that is generally attributed to California’s swelling Hispanic population.  Latinos jumped from 30 to 41 percent of total California high school graduates between 1995 and 2009; in 1995, they constituted 18.5 percent of Cal’s freshman class. That figure dropped to 8.5 percent in 1998, then hit almost 18 percent in 2012.

If the high court rules against using race as a factor in deciding undergraduate admissions then universities can always focus on economic status. If they fail on that front, a new spin on the famous exchange between Fitzgerald and Hemingway may be apt:

The rich are different from you and me.

They get into college.

–Glen Martin

Share this article

Related Articles

Road block: Phil Bokovoy, Cal alum and president of Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods. Paul Chinn/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images

Berkeley v. Berkeley

By Dhoha Bareche

In March, the public was stunned to learn that state courts had ordered UC Berkeley to freeze enrollment at 2020–21 levels, meaning that about 2,600 fewer seats would be available to first-year and transfer students for in-person enrollment in the fall. The news came less than a month before admission offers were to be sent to incoming freshmen. 

Image source: Illustration by Michiko Toki

Coloring in the Lines: How Racially Diverse Should Elite Universities Be?

Over the past four decades, the issue has simmered under the surface, occasionally boiling over into lawsuits and federal complaints. That issue is Asian-American enrollment at elite universities. Percentagewise, Asian Americans are well represented, if not “overrepresented,” at UC Berkeley and other highly selective universities across the country when compared with the general population: Asians/Pacific […]

California Consequences: What If High Court Bans Race Preferences in College Admissions?

Almost lost amid the recent flurry of marquee U.S. Supreme Court rulings—including one endorsing same-sex marriage and another upholding Obamacare—was a judicial move that could have a huge impact on who gets into top colleges. The justices, by opting to reconsider a case that challenges the University of Texas’s use of race and ethnicity to […]