Back with a Vengeance: Berkeley’s Head Epidemiologist On the Return of Pertussis

Professor Arthur Reingold is Head of Epidemiology at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health

California: Is whooping cough coming back?

We certainly are having a resurgence of pertussis in the United States, although it’s never gone away. It is a threat to very young infants, particularly those too young to be vaccinated or who have not yet had a complete series of the vaccines. 

Where does pertussis come from? How can you catch it?

There is no nonhuman source of pertussis. Pertussis is limited strictly to humans. There are no animals that are involved in the transmission of pertussis and it’s not in the environment. So it’s 100 percent a disease that is transmitted from one person to another through coughing and sneezing, through the respiratory route. 

Why hasn’t vaccination wiped pertussis out?

You can be immunized and protected against getting the disease, pertussis, but still have the organism in your nose and throat and spread it to others. Or you can have a very mild illness that is caused by pertussis that causes you to cough, and thereby infect others. So the immunity is not 100 percent from the pertussis vaccine. And what it means is any kind of herd immunity—the way we see, for example, much more powerfully with measles—really can’t be relied upon.

What’s herd immunity?

Herd immunity—the idea that some unvaccinated people are protected because other people are vaccinated and thereby are less likely to come in contact with the organism—is very powerful for some infectious diseases and totally nonexistent and irrelevant for other infectious diseases. Pertussis is kind of in the middle.

Herd immunity is important, and one of the strategies we have for trying to prevent disease in newborn infants who are still too young to be vaccinated is called “cocooning,” where we try to vaccinate all of the adults in the household or who are in contact with that infant. But if people think they’re protected because they live in a generally well-vaccinated population like the United States, and therefore are not likely to get pertussis, that would be the wrong message to give, because the reality is the organism circulates freely in the U.S. despite high levels of vaccination.

Why “cocooning”?

In part because we don’t really have another way to protect young babies except to make sure that, A, they are born to well-immunized mothers and have some passive immunity from antibodies they get from their mother. But then it’s going to be several months before they can have had several doses and be protected through immunization, and we know that most babies who get pertussis get it from immediate contact within their family and the adults in their surroundings. So, B, we are trying to at least reduce the likelihood that the adults around a baby could be a source of infection for the baby. 

Who doesn’t get vaccinated?

So the Supreme Court basically ruled 100 years ago that you must allow people exemptions on religious, personal-belief kinds of grounds. So that’s sort of been basically adjudicated a long time ago, is my understanding. There are also rare instances where you shouldn’t vaccinate. For example, [if] you’ve had a severe allergic reaction to a vaccine, you shouldn’t get more doses of that vaccine. So there are some medical counterindications—they are very rare—but they do exist. And then the whole question is, other than medical counterindications, … what types of religious or personal-belief exemptions do you allow?

But the easier it is for parents to opt out, the higher the proportion of parents who do opt out, and within states that make it easier, there are higher levels of opting out. Particularly there are pockets in the states of Washington and Oregon and California, including here in Northern California but also in Southern California, where as many as 20 or 30 percent of parents are opting out of vaccinating their children against pertussis. There are pockets here on the West Coast, and I suppose elsewhere, where that’s really reached an alarming proportion.

From the Summer 2014 Apocalypse issue of California.
Filed under: Science + Health
Share this article:
Google+ Reddit


He admits that vaccinated people carry the pertussis virus around in their throat even if they are asymptomatic in the same breathe that he uses to support the concept of cacooning a child with vaccinated adults to “protect” the infant. It only makes sense if you are not paying attention.
It makes you wonder: Does the author of this article actually believe what he’s saying or is he a willing shill? As far as I can tell he’s either being deceitful or ignorant.
Interesting, apparently someone deleted my previous comment. Let’s see if this one gets through. The gist of my previous comment was that the author had made so many oversights in this article that his expertise is called into question. One can’t help to wonder if this article is intentionally misleading under the circumstances.
Why you writes that diphteria vaccination generates herd immunity? This seems a scientific nonsense.
Please give me the reference of a randomized double blind clinical trial where the efficacy of hpv vaccination in prevention of cancer has been demonstrated. I do not accept the prevention of hpv (that is obvious) I want the proof of prevention of cancer because the vaccine is purported for that.
It took me seconds to grab this. We have access to studies like never before so the medical system cannot continue to decieve the masses for much longer. Additionally, your arguement that the toxic ingredients are so small that they cause no harm is not a valid one when one considers that a bee sting can kill many. Common sense is not very common in conventional medicine. I have healed heart disease, fibromyalgia and cancer 100% natually yet the system still denies this is possible. Conventional medicine is a business, and I am their worst customer, because I ask questions and do my own research. One cannot poison themselves to good health, common sense.
The Supreme Court upheld in the Dred Scott case that African Americans weren’t human but property, and that human beings can be killed at 9 months (roe v wade). I wouldn’t rely on them for anything. Luckily we have 3 parts of government; Justicial, Executive, and Legislative. The 1st amendment to the constitution states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” NO LAW. PERIOD. End of conversation. But let’s talk about pertussis. And while we’re at it, can we talk about DTaP? The Diptheria,Tetanus and acellular Pertussis vaccine? We have to. Because that’s what’s causing the outbreaks of whooping cough. Anyone that advocates vaccinations, advocates for big pharma and their billion dollar profits. OUR CHILDREN ARE NOT FOR SALE.
Mr. Arthur Reingold states that, “There is no nonhuman source of pertussis.” Well, I hate to let you know but pertussis is grown in a lab by humans. Why don’t you tell us how it’s grown, Mr. Reingold? Where is it found in nature that humans contract the virus? Newborn infants are vaccinated at birth, Mr. Reingold. The Hep B vaccine is given to them because evidently they are going to go shoot drugs with hookers. What about the adverse effects you say are so rare? Well, let’s hear it from the label of the manufacture of the DTaP: “Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. ” All this goes to show that Mr. Reingold is a liar.
I completely agree with you sunshine! The shedding that the vaccinated do is very troubling, to say the least. Injecting something is completely different from eating something. Nature is amazing. The creator of the universe planned well and certain men are trying to take over. The arrogance is disgusting. Agenda 21 population reduction methods are ramping up. Get your free flu shot today! Not.
And you Dorit, failed to mention that vaccines create mutant antibodies that cause cellular malnutrition for up to 50 years. Malnutrition is responsible for all kinds of disease. Vaccines are also connected with many cancers, autoimmune diseases, digestive problems such as crohns, and allergies. If someone comes at me with a vaccine, I’ll consider it an assault with a deadly weapon and will act accordingly ;) Anyone who values there child’s health and life will do likewise in repsonse to mandatory vaccines.
Dorit is a pharmaceutical company hack. I don’t believe she/it actually exist as a person but as an entity that invades every vaccine blog that exists. I have seen your comments for years. You claim that ALL vaccines are safe an effective and that they have been thoroughly tested. This is a false hood that has been perputated by vaccine manufactures for many years. No vaccine has ever been through a TRUE double blind study. Every vaccine claims to have done this but the “placebo” is loaded with the same adjuvants that the vaccine contains like mercury, alumimium, polysorbate 50 etc. The flu vaccine claims to be fully tested but this is impossible since the virus changes so fast and there is no time to test it fully every year before it is released. The flu vaccine is an unscientific experiment every year! We can also look at the Guardisil vaccine, the least tested drug to ever be released on the market. Even the doctors who tested it state they would never give it to our children. Hundreds of young girls have died from this vaccine and thousands hav had their health and lived destroyed for a vaccine that has never been proven to prevent one case of cervical cancer. It is widely known that yearly Pap smears can prevent more cervical cancer than this horrible vaccine. The pharmaceutical companies lie to us all he time just like Dorit. Let’s look at the first vaccine our children get within hours of birth, the hep b vaccine. This is a vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted disease. Can some one tell me how our infants are at risk for this. The vaccine effectiveness for hep b is 6-8 years, do you think your child is going to be sexually active by this age…..oh wait the other risk group are Iv drug users or those who get tattoos….still at risk by 6-8 yrs old. Oh I might want to point out the study used to pursuede us all into hep vaccines was a study done in Vietnam where more than 30% of mothers carry hep b, in this country the % is less than three! but it is an opportunity for pharmaceutical companies to make more money so why not inject newborns needlessly! BTW the vaccine schedule has nothing to do with preventing illness but it is designed to teach parents to become COMPLIANT! ……oh and I forgot to make money for the pharmaceutical companies!
There is no extensive testing of vaccine batches. There are no guarantees that the vaccines are not contaminated with wild virus. My state has suspended some doctors privileges to vaccinate because the vaccines weren’t being stored properly and who knows how many people were vaccinated with defunct vaccine. Doctors give vaccines to sick children. My doctor insisted it was safe. I walked.
As I’m neither a Pro or Anti Vaxer, on the fence evaluating the arguments I can’t help but ask you Jack, and your qualifications are? It seems to me we have an eminently qualified scientist answering questions in an interview and we have someone else suggesting he is misleading in his responses but based on what? In my experience the more you know the more you know you don’t know. Anyone who thinks they know everything usually knows nothing.
Thank you! Laws did very little to help the original people of this land! See how well succumbing to documents with pen it helped? Sad state of affairs we have going on with the constant fear propaganda and training to think….
—Merck used rabbit antibodies to falsify data. —Merck used aluminum in placebo. —Merck/CSL used another vaccine containing mercury as placebo. —Merck tested Gardasil for 6 months and FDA fast tracked the approval. (calls into question the validity of the data and which violate ethical principles and norms include: 1) the use of unsafe equipment ; 2) falsifying analytical results; 3) failure to report adverse effects; and 4) retaining subjects in the experiment, which due to their health, should not be part of an experiment.” By: Gabriela Segura, MD) —Drug companies never studied the synergistic effects of combinations of shots. —Drug companies never studied the synergistic effects of toxins and heavy metals together. —The entire CDC recommended childhood schedule of 49 doses of 14 vaccines before age 6 has never been studied. —Vaccines have not been studied for carcinogenicity (cancer causing), birth defects or infertility. —Vaccines have not been studied for mutagenicity or autoimmunity (DNA in vaccines causing autoimmunity). —The FDA doesn’t require vaccine manufactures to test vaccine adjuvants for safety. —The U.S. The government won’t do a controlled study comparing the health of completely vaccinated to completely unvaccinated children. Likely, they are afraid of the results. —Dong-Pyou Han, a scientist from Iowa State University, was found guilty of fabricating and falsifying data in HIV vaccine trials. —Dr. Poul Thorsen (principal investigator on the Danish Autism Studies) indicted on 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering by a U.S. Federal Grand Jury. —CDC employee Dr. William Thompson witnessed his colleagues destroying data and he was told to lie. He came out as a whistle blower in 2014 and asked to be subpoenaed but Congress still have not called for a hearing. —Simpsonwood Conference cover-up. A closed meeting between CDC, WHO (World Health Organization), pharmaceutical companies, and scientists. (2000) —CDC and government use flawed and manipulated studies to repeat lies to the public claiming they are “safe and effective”. —SV40 (cancer virus) was found in the Salk’s polio vaccine produced between 1955 and 1961. The government chose to cover it up and gave contaminated vaccines to millions. Sabin’s oral polio vaccines were also contaminated from 1961 until 1973 or even later. The OPV caused many cases of polio. —The Cutter Incident: In April 1955 more than 200 000 children received a polio vaccine in which the process of inactivating the live virus proved to be defective. Within days there were reports of paralysis. Investigations revealed that the vaccine, manufactured by Cutter Laboratories, had caused 40 000 cases of polio, leaving 200 children with varying degrees of paralysis and killing 10. Health agencies reclassified, redefined, changed requirements, and renamed polio cases to make them go away.
The Nuremberg Code trumps the US Supreme Court’s ruling on mandatory vaccines or any medical procedure,clearly expressing the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
Excellent comment. hahah :) Oh whistleblower on the aP vaccine, it dont work :) Every baby infected in Australia last 20 years, has been infected by a aP vaccinated child, usually symptomless sibling. Took 10 years Australia, and USA, for the bacteria to go round and round and spread, right through that symptomless vaccinated herd. Then? Bout 3 years after last jab, vaccine fails, and they all get whooping cough. How can they not? the whole friggin vaccinated herd are carriers.
Why do healthier communities produce fewer babies? What is the logic and evidence of that?
Aluminum does persistent in the Brain after vaccination. New research has demonstrated this. To date there are no CUMMULATIVE SAFETY STUDIES on today’s schedule. No safety protocols for adding more vaccines, no long term risk analysis of the current vaccine schedule. As with all pharmaceuticals, the more you take the greater the risk of adverse reactions. Vaccines aren’t magic, just mandated with coercion.
wow, no one comments for twelve months I comment, and suddenly two absurd comments, that make no sense?
Dorit do you really believe ingested aluminum is the same as injected aluminum? You have documented your ignorance. It is no wonder that the public is really starting to question the likes of you “no toxic substances in vaccines in the amounts given”, Dr. Pan “the most toxic ingredient in vaccines is water”, and Dr. Offit “an infant can theoretically withstand the antigenic load of 10,000 vaccines”. And by the way, the MSDS statements for vinegar and olive oil are not scary at all, and look nothing like what we find for substances like thimerosal, aluminum adjuvant, formaldehyde, etc. You might want to start doing some serious research using materials which do not already agree with your skewed world view, you might find information like the following interesting. Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain www[dot]biomedcentral[dot]com/1741-7015/11/99 “Although generally well tolerated, alum is occasionally detected within monocyte-lineage cells long after immunization in presumably susceptible individuals with systemic/neurologic manifestations or autoimmune (inflammatory) syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA).” “Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection.” “Nanomaterials can be transported by monocyte-lineage cells to DLNs, blood and spleen, and, similarly to HIV, may use CCL2-dependent mechanisms to penetrate the brain. This occurs at a very low rate in normal conditions explaining good overall tolerance of alum despite its strong neurotoxic potential. However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier or high constitutive CCL-2 production.” Aluminum Adjuvant Induces Motor Neuron Death in Mice (Shaw et al) www[dot]ncbi[dot]nlm[dot]nih[dot]gov/pubmed/17114826 “Behavioral testing showed motor deficits in the aluminum treatment group that expressed as a progressive decrease in strength measured by the wire-mesh hang test (final deficit at 24 wk; about 50%). Significant cognitive deficits in water-maze learning were observed in the combined aluminum and squalene group (4.3 errors per trial) compared with the controls (0.2 errors per trial) after 20 wk. Apoptotic neurons were identified in aluminum-injected animals that showed significantly increased activated caspase-3 labeling in lumbar spinal cord (255%) and primary motor cortex (192%) compared with the controls. Aluminum-treated groups also showed significant motor neuron loss (35%) and increased numbers of astrocytes (350%) in the lumbar spinal cord. The findings suggest a possible role for the aluminum adjuvant in some neurological features associated with GWI and possibly an additional role for the combination of adjuvants.”
LD50 applies to humans as well, Mr. Crocker. Case in point, Radiological Medicine. Research first, please.
Here’s what I know as fact: In the September 2017 report from the Department of Justice (Sarah C. Duncan, Trial Attorney) for the reporting period from 11/16/16 – 8/15/17, adjudicated settlements for Influenza injury included the following, where petition filing to settlement ranged from 6 months to 11 years 2 months: Allergic Encephalomyelitis; Amplified Pain Syndrome; Adhesive Capsulitis; Anaphylaxis; Anti-MAG Neuropathy; Axillary nerve injury; Bell’s Palsy; Bilateral upper extremity weakness; Brachial Neuritis; Brachial Plexopathy; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Cerebellar Ataxia; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystitis; Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Neuropathy; Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP); Chronic Pain; Death; Demyelinating Disorder; Demyelinating Injury; Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans; Difficulty breathing; Dystonia; Encephalitis; Facial Spasms; Fatigue; Fibromyalgia; Guillain-Barré Syndrome; Hearing Loss; Hypotension; Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia and/or optic neuritis; Ischemic Optic Neuropathy; Kidney Failure; Limbic Encephalitis; Miller Fisher Variant; Mononeuritis Multiplex; Myalgia; Myoclonic Seizures; Necrotizing Myositis; Neuropathy of the Medial and Radial Nerves; Neuropathy; Optic Neuritis; Parsonage Turner Syndrome, Peripheral Neuropathy; Myalgia; Myoclonic Seizures; Pityriasis Lichenoides et Varioliformis Acuta (PLEVA); Polyradiculoneuropathy; Post-Vaccine Syndrome with Demyelinating Features; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rotator Cuff Tear; Seizure Disorder, SIRVA, Sixth Cranial Nerve Palsy; Small Fiber Neuropathy; Speech Problems; Stevens Johnson Syndrome; Tibial Nerve Palsy; Tinnitus; Torso and bilateral upper extremity paresthesia; Transverse Myelitis, Trigeminal Neuralgia; Urticaria; Vasovagal Syncope; Vision Loss; Vocal Cord Paralysis; Weakness, Wegener’s Granulomatosis.
The issue here is one of civil rights, under public health cover. The U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence were intended as legal shields, not swords, but that has all changed since 911. Today, we have flipped 180 degrees to adopt “pre-crime” as a rationalization for suspending and worse, abolishing guaranteed Rights. In the instant matter, a government can suspend a Right but only subject to a “compelling state interest”. A vague, ambiguous and argumentative “threat” is the foundation here, which, when compared to precedents, fails to rise to any compelling state interest. For example, during the American Civil War (1.0), Lincoln suspended, but did not abolish habeas corpus. It was restored upon the resolution of that conflict. During World War II, FDR suspended, but did not abolish civil rights for Japanese Americans. Their Rights were restored upon that conflict’s resolution. But here, the alleged threat never resolves. It is analogous to “terrorism”, and anyone who wishes to argue that your Rights haven’t been abolished since 911 should respond with your evidence. So are we to accept that the alleged, hypothetical, argumentative threat of a prospective communicable disease rises to the level of the American Civil War and World War II? Actually, beyond both since what we are talking about is not the suspension Rights, but the outright abolition of them, including, but not limited to; private property; free speech; religious practice, etc. When exactly does this author state, with medical certainty, that the alleged threat is gone? Simple answer? It never does. So the list of obligatory vaccines increases. Moreover, there is no due process with vaccines. Special “star chamber” courts have been created that remove due process and replace it with “special masters”. Vaccines thus become not a public health solution, but an investment model protected from liability at the expense of the recipient who must be subjected to coercion or police action to comply against their consent. There is no longer any “informed-consent’ under the pre-crime metric, when consent is abolished under public health cover. Once something ….anything for that matter, becomes obligatory, the targeted audience is no longer on a need-to-know basis. Why? Because, like-it-or-not, you’re getting it. Any disclosure is discretionary and can be removed or withheld at any future time. Ask someone in the military how this works (they are “government property” or “GI’s” (government issue). Thus, the public also becomes “property” which is a back-handed way of saying slavery. Finally, legal advocates for obligatory vaccines have also advocated the use of force or “police power” to enforce such illegal acts as obligatory vaccination, under color of law. There is no way to “unring” the vaccine bell, meaning, how does the author speculate he can “unvaccinate” someone once the alleged threat has been resolved? In California, the madatory child safety seat laws serve as precedent for obligatory vaccines for children. However, this is not on point since a child is not required to wear those devices outside the vehicle. Moreover, car seats are not overly burdensome. In the case of the vaccines, there are less onerous means to protect a population at risk beside a “one-size-fits-all” solution. I suppose FDR under the current legal metric could have interned whole communities outside the Japanese American community using this logic. This is a civil rights issue under public health cover. It uses irrational and rational fear to engineer consent. And when the engineering of consent fails? The authoritarian arm of the state rises to replace that consent. Already the technology exists to force-vaccinate populations by stealth using atmospheric aerosols and genetically modified foods. Thus, this push to abolish civil rights is a PSYOPS to get the bewildered herd to celebrate their demise, using fear. Finally, the issue of Deconstructionist bias must be exposed… word meanings purposely changed or altered to advance an agenda (vaccines). Today, we see this Deconstructionist bias. The new definition of “healthy” now means “vaccinated”. No longer is a disease-free, asymptomatic person defined as healthy. To be healthy under the new Postmodern metric, one must have a disease introduced into their bodies artificially, and by force if necessary. Welcome to the Brave, New World.
The other collateral issue here which is as dangerous as some prospective communicable disease is the pitching of “Scientism” to replace objective science. All science is argumentative. 100%. Today’s “the science is settled” is in medicine, often tomorrow’s malpractice lawsuit. In justice courts, presently (but not for much longer) both sides are allowed to call “expert witnesses” — who more-often-than-not, contradict one another, under oath. How can this be so, if science is absolute? Simple answer? It isn’t. Testimony is opinion — not fact. If it wasn’t, the justice courts would simply allow only one “expert” to testify… the “official one”. But, articles such as the one here lead us to believe there is only one side of the issue. The “science is settled”? That is more religion than science or “Scientism” — the fusion of religion and science, under various cover stories. Where are the double-blind, randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trials? Simple answer? There are none. Even if there were such studies, my response in re: civil rights, makes any of these hypothetical studies moot. The power of choice still applies, subject to some compelling state interest. Lowering the bar for such interests is a financial exercise disguised as a public health one. But promoting scientists as “gods” who have the power to rule, by force if necessary, over lesser-gods is what we see here. Under this metric, theories — not matter how subjective, become objective facts, by definition (Deconstructionist bias). Skepticism is redefined as heresy. In a free and open society, people who make wise choices usually do better than those who make bad decisions. Once removed of any choice, such objective analysis becomes impossible. So hidden in this discussion is the promotion (PSYOPS) of Scientism along with the engineering of consent for voluntary abolition of civil rights. Anyway you slice this topic, it is ripe with issues that pale in comparison to the alleged threat used to rationalize the effort. And once your Rights are gone? Well .. .history tells us it is far better to keep your Rights than to lose them only to (re)fight or revisit history. And there is no vaccine to protect you from that tyranny. The only Rights you have? Are the Rights you assert. And no religion under scientific or other cover can change that.
You are absolutely right Sunshine - thank you for your comments - especially those around Drorit - she is a known “faithful servant” of Big Pharma - I do not know why she bothers because we all know she is compromised.
Ok show test results for all vaccines and their ingredients , and please explain sudden deaths from vaccines tested for safety, please explain the billions paid out by the Vaccine court for death and injury from your ? Safe vaccines . SAFE , TESTED ?????
When is this kike going to shut her mouth? She sounds like she’s drunk. Pertussis vaccine doesn’t work. You’re contagious for a duration of time after vaccination. Vaccinations don’t even work in infants until age one. SIDS is caused by the pertussis part of the vaccine. In 1979 in Tennessee several babied died after the DPT shot. FULL cell pertussis. A-cell pertussis vaccine since 1996. The babies were vaccinated from the same lot of vaccines. Not a coincidence.
Dorit and Paul Offit should know this. They’re Jewish.
Where is the study that proves the current child vaccine schedule is safe and doesn’t cause health problems ??? Where is the study that shows the health of vaxxed and unvaxxed? Take some monkeys and do the damn study. Guarentee the fully vaxxed monkeys will be damaged and the unvaxxed ones will be fine…do the’ll be fun to see
Vaccines are not rigorously tested..its a few weeks and up against other vaccines and they have no idea what causes what..its sloppy…but who wouldn’t be sloppy if they are held liable for their product. Vaccines are useless…they just damage people..
First of all there is an enormous diffrenece between ingestion and injection. Secondly, there have been 0 safety studies of the current vaccine schedule. There are several contraindications for vaccines that aren’t even listed. There is no ling term studies. if you think I would inject my newborn baby after a safety study of 4 days on an adult, you are part if the problem. Besides, enjoy your money while you have it because this kind of corruption WILL be shut down.
I’m sorry but the statement that vaccines are extensively research is misleading and untrue. Please point out the research papers on the current CDC recommended vaccination schedule. Please provide links so I may read that research. Not one double blind study has been done on injection babies with 6-8 vaccines at one time. Also, could you please provide the studies on the long term efficacy of these vaccines? The studies I’ve read indicate most of people’s immunity levels drop significantly as years go by, hence the recommended BOOSTER vaccinations. Please educate me with all of your studies!
It is impossible to become immune to a bacteria. Pertussis (whooping cough) is a bacteria. Tetanus is a bacteria. Diphtheria is a bacteria. Take whooping cough… injecting the bacteria into a person is just making them an a asymptomatic carrier of whooping cough. This is why vaccine logic isn’t logic…it’s insanity. The idea is that the vaccine will decrease the risk of an active infection. There is a big problem with that idea. Anyone who is an asymptomatic carrier…and they are reexposed to that bacteria (like being around someone recently vaccinated) can trigger the dormant bacteria into an active infection. The CDC’s own data called ‘Pertussis surveillance report’s’ detail that you are between 4-8x more likely to develop whooping cough if you are fully vaccinated vs someone who is completely unvaccinated. Go look it up…its not hidden information. Whooping cough is on the rise because children receive 5 doses of the dtap vaccine. That’s a lot of carriers of the bacteria. And that is why vaccinating against whooping cough is completely USELESS.


Add new comment