Killer App

A Berkeley researcher weighs in on cell phones and cancer.
By Eric Schultz

Update: In the fall of 2014, the Berkeley City Council is considering an ordinance that would make it the only city in the nation to require cell phone warning stickers. We explore whether, based on the latest science, the proposal is a proper precaution, or paranoia, here.

You, me, and everyone we know probably has a radio emitter close to our bodies, blasting off radiation almost constantly. Teens keep it under their pillow so they can hear it at night. Babies play with it. It’s a cell phone, and while it’s revolutionized how we interact with one another, scientists have been debating for years about its possible harmful effects.

Is all that radiation harmful? Can mobile phones cause brain cancer?

Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., directs a research center in the School of Public Health. He participated in a meta-analysis led by Seung-Kwon Myung, an epidemiologist from South Korea. The researchers looked at 23 recent studies of cell phones and their potential link to tumor risk. What Moskowitz had to say might change your mind about your iPhone or Blackberry.

California: What did your analysis find?

Joel Moskowitz: When you look across all 23 studies, you find no increased cancer risk. However, when you break the studies down in terms of the quality of the research, you find two distinctly different patterns of results.

The methodological quality was rated according to the appropriate use of control groups, blinding of study participants and researchers, etc. In the lower-quality studies you find what would actually appear to be a reduced risk of cancer. That accounts for 13 of the studies.

In the other ten studies, the higher-quality studies, we found an elevated cancer risk: approximately 10 percent higher than the general population. These tumors are mostly of the head and neck: gliomas, acoustic neuromas, meningiomas, and tumors of the salivary gland.

One of the interesting things we found with our meta-analysis is, when looking at a subset of people who used mobile phones for ten or more years, and there were eight of these studies, overall there was a significant risk of brain tumors. There is now evidence from two major studies that the risk of glioma, a common brain cancer, is doubled after ten years of cell phone use.

C: Did you find any connection among the lower-quality studies, the ones that found no risk?

JM: Well, almost all of the low-quality studies, most were part of a consortium called Interphone, were funded all or in part by the cell phone industry. Interphone is underwritten by the WHO [World Health Organization] in part, but also has supplemental funding from the cell phone industry.

C: Have you found any other outside influences on the research?

JM: I’m cautious in reading this literature, because so many biased studies have been published. In the past there have been a few attempts by editors to rewrite results, and by funding agencies to suppress research. Some early pioneers who found biologic reactivity lost funding for their laboratories. There was outright suppression by the military of some of the earliest research, particularly around radar, which is similar to the radiation emitted by cell phones and cordless phones.

The industry, by and large, has not been cooperative with supplying data for research. In the U.S., they have not been forthcoming at all.

C: Did you identify any other negative effects from cell phone or low-level radiation?

JM: One study found evidence of increased risk of salivary gland tumors. We’re hearing from a few physicians about breast cancer in women who keep the cell phone in their breast pocket. We’ve also heard of bone marrow disease in men who keep the phone in their hip pocket. However, these are isolated reports, so it’s hard to know if these effects are due to cell phone use.

C: What can we do to lower these risks?

JM: With electromagnetic radiation, the intensity is a function of the square of the distance, so the difference between 1 inch from your brain and 10 inches from your brain is a factor of 100. You get a substantial reduction of exposure just by keeping it away from your body. So, use a headset, especially a corded device.

[Of] particular concern is the proximity of the phone to sensitive bodily organs, especially your head and neck, but also your reproductive organs. You also have to be concerned if you’re not using the phone but it is turned on, because you’re exposing that part of your body to the radiation.

Another important piece of advice—and by my count about a dozen nations have already issued precautionary health warnings—focuses on children. The concern is that their developing brains are much more vulnerable, and they’re going to have much longer durations of exposure if they start using phones as children. Because it generally takes decades to see brain tumors, and their exposures are starting at a much younger age, they may start having tumors as middle-aged adults. You want to reduce use among children as much as you can.

From the Winter 2010 Inside Out issue of California.
Filed under: Science + Health
Share this article:
Google+ Reddit

Comments

Perhaps Joel could suggest the mechanism whereby the radiation associated with cell phones can cause a brain tumor? Cell phone radiation does not contain enough energy to break chemical bonds, which might result in mutations or chromosome breaks. The amount of cell phone usage is irrelevant. The level of radiation from a cell phone will never reach the threshold amount necessary to break a chemical bond. In the story, Joel is quoted as saying, “We’re hearing from a few physicians about breast cancer in women who keep the cell phone in their breast pocket. We’ve also heard of bone marrow disease in men who keep the phone in their hip pocket. However, these are isolated reports, so it’s hard to know if these effects are due to cell phone use.” I know someone who kept his leather wallet in his hip pocket and got prostate cancer. Applying Joel’s reasoning, I suppose it’s hard to know if this effect was due to wallet use.”
Will using the speakerphone and holding the phone in front of you reduce the risk? Why is this options not mentioned?
Outstanding! Heard your talk on Pacifica radio in Los Angeles: KPFK, 90.7 FM. Thank you for your work.
Outstanding! Heard your talk on Pacifica radio in Los Angeles: KPFK, 90.7 FM.
I’d like to read the primary literature for this analysis before chucking my phone and yelling fire. haha
Ive been researching this for many years. My aunt lost her husband in the late 70s to brain cancer. He was in the Navy and posted on a ship with high radiation. She has told me stories that the government would let out. Another cousin of mine was also in the Navy for a long time, he told me in back 2009 about the precautions he uses in his home against radiation which he learned from the military experience. I thought he was nuts. Then when I couldnt figure out why I was sick all the time I found this article saying, “My Cell Phone is making me sick” and I found out alot of stuff that would turn me into a conspiracy theorist. So I guess you could say I am a believer now. This was a really good article: http://www.chrisbeatcancer.com/electropollution/ FYI, I read that using the “corded” headset makes the headset act as an antenna actually drawing more radiation to your head. Have you heard of “Blue Tube” or other devices claiming to cut the radiation but using them? Ive tried them and they just break so fast I cant keep one on my phone, but I do have frequent ear and headaches after cell use so I just try not to use it so much. -gina
History has shown us that it took decades for acknowledgement that tobacco and asbestos caused cancer and death. Wireless radiation? Please consider: Drs. Pall and Dart, Presentation to the Oregon State House of Representatives, Committee on Healthcare (2/2014): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-nYxZHak6I Naval Medical Research Institute, Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘Effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed To Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation. 4 October 1971 http://www.justproveit.net/sites/default/files/prove-it/files/military_r... Denial won’t get us anywhere.
National Association for Children and Safe Technology Get informed + Take action + Pass it on Please visit us at: www.nacst.org

Add new comment